Philosophical Thoughts,
Paradigm, and Transformation
I have
been thinking of joining this seminar conducted by One Asia Foundation on
Tuesday, January 28, 2013 at Faculty of Cultural Sciences-UGM on the other day
that ‘mbak I’ and I have talked about. Humanitarian science is interesting to
me, especially that they will talk upon the Asian Community Development
within the social and cultural approach.
Moreover, what could be better than visiting Sapardi Djoko Damono’s past place
of study? Besides, it has been very boring talking about AEC in the context of Economics
over and over again.
Hmmm it
seems that this seminar’s gonna be a very long one. I looked up at the schedule
that the committee sent me the night before. 7.30-17.30. They must be kidding,
in my thought. But this is not a usual opportunity, why dont I give it a try?
Thinking
about Asian Community or the ASEAN Community in 2015, there is a tendency of
creating one community, extremely a borderless world. This is interesting, the
trend of exchanging students here and there, and the rapid growth in social
media has been creating a world without border. An information in one part of
the world is rapidy interchanged
throughout the internet. Digital era has
been amazingly restored and disseminated so much information throughout the
cloud computing.
I felt
relief seeing some friends were also there. Ana, Dewi (Jinni), Galuh were there
at least since mbak I didnt come finally due to her internship. Ah, I saw Arina
as well. It was a long while since we met at the community, a writing
community. This makes me feel so old though and so much changes have been going
on. Well, dynamism is part of self improvement and determination its self.
Mr. Yoji
Sato-One Asia Foundation
I have
not known anything about One Asia Foundation. But, Mr. Yoji Sato introduced us
with this foundation. I’ll share what I resumed during the seminar. I might not
be able to catch up every single thing but I tried my best to get the main
point. One Asia Foundation is a voluntary-based and independet institution
which has three basic principles-egalitarian,
no barriers, and no politics.
Btw, you
know what, I thought Mr. Sato would talk in English. Indeed he did greet us in
English but then, he admired me by delivering smeinar in Japanese. I love the
way Japanese talk anyway. Nice accent. Plus, I always admire ther philosophical
thought. Sadly I could catch only some words that wouldnt make sense at all. Good
thing that there was a translator who helped us. I heard that not so many
people in Japan intend to master English due to their high nationalism in their
own language. However, his deep motivation and good will to unite people with
the same vision take him here, creating this foundation that spread out across
the continents. He assumed that Asian community doesn’t mean that it should
close any relationship within other countries outside, instead, that the Asian
community relates and will always closely connect with other countries. Thats
why he welcome Russia, US, Turky, etc. as
part of One Asia Foundation.
His
motivation was driven also by the spirit of former president Soekarno.
Historically, Soekarno also initiated Konferensi Asia Afrika-KAA in 1955. Then
the reunion of KAA in 2005 showed an increase number of countries
participating there.
The
unique method of One Asia is that they offer an open learning access and that
they seem to be sincerely visiting here
and there to build the ties and cooperation in the exchange of knowledge
through offering coursess from all over the world. See, this seminar is also
fee and they said it’s an indepently funded, so.. They have been doing
cooperation with many universities across the world. In Indonesia, One Asia has
UGM, ITB, and UPI as the pioneer universities offering this program of multidisciplinary
courses. Anyway, I am still looking for the information of the courses being
offered here ever since I have not heard it before.
The
concept of courses offered here are omnibus style (serial and multidiscipline),
independency, and credit transferrable
to the home university (this one is good point that our university will count
the credit of taking the course via One Asia). There
are three barriers that overcome (threat analysis) which include
ego (self), company-organization, and nation-race. Our ego, is a self barrier
that we overcome differences (any way this shouldnt be considred as threat, i
guess? Weakness I
thought). Company here is the threat from the economic interest. The condition
of two competing companies from different countries will probably affect the
cooperation of the two countries. Recently, due to the conflict in Syria, the
access of a learning open source based in US became inaccessible to students
from Syria. Isn’t that quite interesting, huh? Politics and
economics ineterst sometimes become nonsense
boundary. Mr. Sato emphasized on how shall we graduate throuh
the three boundaries isn’t that we eradicate each boundary. Instead, we
breakthrough and learn through all the boundaries.
Then,
the question is how to pass those barriers? He made this analogy. An apple with
its outer skin of multidisciplines: economics, politics, education, health,
law, science, and so on. Then inside the apple is stack of layers which consist
of self ego, human being, life, and ultimate substance (correspondingly from
outer to inner part of the apple). The analogy of an apple means that the
complexity of the multidiscipline problem is just an skinned problems that
should be loooked through the layers. Those problems can be solved as we pass
through the layers of boundaries.
Another
analogy he picked was a big tree. Sometimes, people look a problem at what is
visible. They only see a tree from itts appearnace, the flowers, the leaves,
and the tigs whiich are only the surface that would probably cahnge overtime. They
don’t see the fundamental problem inside, the roots of the problems. If we
think this tree is ourself. Those changes might make us feel sick. Indeed,
there are invsible part to be considered essential. There needs to be balance
in coping with the tangible and intangible matters.
What
do you think of a baby? Does a baby have a self ego? No. According to the
researches the body is not the same as self ego. A baby doesnt own a self ego.
This research was carried by Friederich II (1194-1250) and Amala&Camala
(1920). Friederich was a Holy Roman Empire, King of Sicily who did experiment over
several babies. Those babies were not named. You know what happened then,all
those babies without name died at the age of 12. Do you not believe? Lets do a
trial on our babies. Dont name them and see whats gonna happen.. :D (surely he was kidding)
According
to Mr. Sato, baby is a crucial stage. At the age of 0-10 months a baby is
figuring out the self ego. Self formation starts by giving the name. That is
why a baby would smile when you call out her name since she has been
doctrinized by the environment calling the name over and over.
Human
has the opposite meaning to self ego. Ego is self-individual thinking and
perspective. Meanwhile, human... Humanity is what we see ourselves as a
collective of individu. The basic reason of unity is that we are human..
Oh
maaan, it’s still long way of finishing the summary. There are still so many
sessions and I think I wont finish reblog it tonight. Typing is tiring, huh.
So, I will continue later on when I found the mood hehe.
From this
perspective, actually I have another deep thought that is quite in line with
spirituality. Don’t we realize that even before the creation of European Union,
OPEC, sistercity, Asian Community, or anything alike, muslim has built a
borderless brotherhood? When those speakers in front of me are talking about
how should awareness be built between the countries in terms of social, economic, security, and
politics, I have been thinking that there
is certainly no border upon muslimhood.. This is probably out of topic. But honestly this is a beautiful thinking. Thats a very nice thought about Islam.
How we are all the same. What makes us different is not what seems visible. Our
obedience and somewhat invisible are what become essential. This is
very beautiful, isn’t it?
*I tried participating once.. I was admired by the anthropologist Prof. Heddy Shri Ahimsaputra. I asked but didnt get a chance to discuss with him :( anyway Dewi said I had a good voice, really? Good one as of being an emcee-master of ceremony. Indeed I used to be, at least every Monday morning during elemntary school hahaha
No comments:
Post a Comment